There are two main financial issues that TT faculty need to know about: startup funds and salary. Pfffft, I hear you whisper. I know all about that stuff. Aaaaah, but do you really understand how it works? You may have a gazillion years of sciencey training under your belt but do you really understand budgets and how far they can/cannot stretch? Some recent emails and other discussions with some of my pre-TT bloggy buds suggests maybe not.
1. Startup funds
Newbie TT faculty startup funds are highly dependent on the field, institution and person. My work is split across two fields and my primary appointment is in a field that often doesn’t do a lot of basic science so startup funds are typically very low. For example, several of my friends’ startup funds were only 20% of what I was given. Yes, that’s right: 20%. They can’t afford to hire a postdoc and can’t afford to buy major equipment. They are essentially operating with an empty lab or within someone else’s lab until they can get their own external funding. The other field in which I work is pretty heavy on the basic sciences and the startup packages are typically much, much higher than what I received which means that TT faculty who are employed directly in that area are able to get going very quickly. I’m very fortunate that I had a Dean and Chair that are/were basic scientists and recognized that awesome science often comes with a hefty price tag. I received a package that was great from some perspectives but not so great if you look at it from others.
So what comes out of your startup funds?
Well, that largely depends on what you negotiate. Do you have to pay for salaries and/or benefits of anyone you employ? Student stipends and/or tuition? Do you get an additional allowance for equipment purchases? While $100K can seem like an astronomical number to some, that will really only be enough to employ one postdoc for one year and maybe buy one moderately-large-ish piece of equipment along with a few animals. $200K might double all of this but if you want/need bigger lab toys, transgenic animals, per diems, etc, it might still only get you one postdoc for one year.
And if you inherit a completely empty lab like I did, you’ll need to spend a ton of cash on basic stuff like beakers, flasks, bottles, weigh boats, pipettes, mini-centrifuges, electrophoresis rigs, etc. Each of these items are relatively inexpensive but the costs of buying all of them in one hit starts to add up very, very quickly. Throw in delivery charges for everything. $50 here. $30 there. New primary antibodies? $350 each plus $50 delivery. How many antibodies do you need? One? Ten? Watch the dollars fly out the door. And don’t forget you need secondary antibodies. And reagents. And tubes. And slides. What about basic chemicals? Any EDTA on your shelves? NaCl? PBS? You may have to buy everything.
Does your lab have any existing computers? Yes? Excellent. How old are they? When they take 30 minutes to boot up and are still running off Win95, you might need to update them. How many computers will your lab need for everyday work? One? Two? Three? What about computers to run the equipment in the lab? Can you just buy a bottom of the line Mac or PC for those or will you need to shell out more dollars to increase the processing power? What software does your department and/or school have an institutional license for? I don’t have to pay for MS Office but have had to buy software for stats, referencing, etc, as they aren’t covered under the institutional or departmental umbrellas.
Ok, what about services such as disposal of biohazardous waste, laundering of lab coats, removal of hazardous chemicals, leasing of gas cylinders? Who will have to pay for those?
Need to use a core facility on campus? How much does it cost per hour? How many hours will you need to use it? Who’s paying for that? My guess is that it’s coming out of your startup funds.
Do you have access to common-use equipment? You do? Excellent. How old is it? How many people use it? Is there a service contract on it and, if so, are you expected to contribute to the cost? Is it located in a common lab or will you have to ask for permission to use it if it’s located in someone else’s lab?
And how many meetings do you plan to attend each year? How many people from your lab will go? Who’s paying for airfares, hotels, registration and per diems? My department gives faculty a moderate annual allowance that will essentially cover one out of town meeting that requires flights. Anything above that has to come out of my research budget or my own pocket. The cost of sending the lab peeps will either come out of my research monies, my pocket or theirs. Students can get a tiny bit of funding for travel but I’ll have to pay for most of it.
Getting freaked out yet? But wait, there’s more.
2. Salaries
The majority of TT faculty are on 9 month appointments and your actual monthly salary will depend on what your school does about doling that money out. Some will average it out over 12 months so that you get paid over the summer. Others, like mine, will pay you from mid-August to mid-May and then you’re on your own for 3 months. I still pay 12 months of health insurance though with the cost of covering the summer months taken out of the last pay of the academic year in May. Other stuff like mortgages, utility bills, etc, will have to come out of money that I save during the 9 months.
If I want to be paid over the summer, I have to find a way to get the money out of my research budget. As part of my contract negotiations for my position, I receive a full summer salary for the first two years. That means that I have one more summer on full pay after which time my annual salary will decrease by 25% back to the base 9 month salary. As I’m on a work visa that is tied to my faculty position, I can’t go and work at a summer camp for 3 months or teach at a community college. The only way I can legally earn the extra pay is by getting a shitload of funding and paying myself out of those. Or going without.
I also have to find a way to pay the salaries of the lab peeps. Luckily my startup deal means that I don’t pay the benefits for my postdoc if I pay her salary from my startup funds but the school will only pay up to a certain amount (equivalent to about one year of benefits) then I’ll have to pay for that too. Each school pays a different amount of the salary in benefits but you can bet that it’s far more than you realize.
I pay the hourly wage of my research assistant as well as her benefits. When she transitions to the graduate program, I’ll have to pay for her summer stipend otherwise she may be forced to find full time work so that she can pay for the roof over her head and feed her family. And those undergrads that will be rotating through my lab over the summer? Yep, I have to pay them too. And any other grad students? Yep, summer salary for them as well.
So how much do I pay my lab peeps?
I pay my postdoc more than the NRSA guidelines. Not much more, but a couple of thousand above. The minimum salary set at my school is below the NRSA. Why don’t I pay her well-above the NRSA? I can’t afford to. Well, that's not strictly true. I can pay her more but if I increase her salary by as little as 10%, then instead of guaranteeing her employment for 2 years, I would only be able to do so for just over 18 months.
I pay my research assistant the going hourly rate which, while more than the minimum wage, is still less than she could make waiting tables when you factor in tips. I would like to pay her more but her wage also adds up over the course of a year. If I pay her 10% more, I would probably only be able to take on one undergrad student over the summer.
Is it just junior faculty on limited startup funds that have to make these kinds of decisions? Ummm, no. We recently had a debate about this conundrum and this came from my good buddy and relatively well-funded, PhysioProf, in response to a fellow blogger asking if her PI would go broke by paying her an extra $10K per year:
NIH has played the game for over a decade of inexorably raising the NRSA salary scale--which is what the majority of post-docs are paid as a matter of institutional policy even when not on NRSA fellowships--while inexorably cutting overall R01 budgets via administrative reductions in both competing and non-competing grant awards (which have been *compounded* reductions for the last four or five years in the case of the latter) and by not increasing the maximum modular budget. So no, there absolutely is no money available to "throw an extra $10,000" to every post-doc in a laboratory. If I "throw an extra $10,000" to each of my post-docs, two of them are going to have to be terminated to pay for the salary increases of the rest.
So, let’s look at the worst case scenario - what will happen if I don’t get significant funding in the next year and/or if my postdoc isn’t able to get a fellowship to cover her own salary?
Well, we’ll be in big trouble. I might be able to grovel to the Dean and ask for assistance but given that Really Big U was on the receiving end of several major budget cuts last year and is looking to close programs, the chances of them investing more money in me are slim. To keep her on, I would have to cut costs somewhere else which means firing the research assistant, not taking undergrads into paid summer internships and not paying the grad students a summer stipend.
And what happens if I can get some funding in the next year but not a shitload?
My first priority is to pay the lab peeps’ salaries/stipends because without them the lab will grind to a halt. Then we’ll need to pay for animals, consumables, reagents, etc. The last priority will be to pay for my own summer salary.
Yes, that’s right. It’s highly likely that I’ll be working 3 months for free next year while my lab peeps get paid. Why don’t I just take those 3 months and head off on an extended vacation? If I did that, who would keep an eye on the lab? Who’s going to write grants? Who’s going to keep the wolves at bay? This isn’t me being magnanimous and taking one for the team. I will be very, very cranky if I don’t have a summer salary. If we get to this point though, I won’t have a choice.
I can hear the grad students and postdocs whispering again. But don’t assistant professors earn a shitload of money on their 9 month salaries anyway? Surely they should just stop whinging about working for free over the summer.
I’ll be honest - yes, I earn more than I did as a postdoc. If I get a full 12 month pay, I earn about double what I did during my postdoc. With the 9 month salary, it’s only about 50% more that my postdoc wage. I can live on that pretty easily but it’s not really much compensation for completing 13 years of higher education and a 4 year postdoc as well as having the added responsibility of ensuring the well-being of lap peeps, making sure the research is ticking along, teaching, doing all of the servicey-type stuff, etc.
A little more complicated than just doling money out for reagents, huh?

Thanks for this post, PiT. Definitely something I've been thinking a lot about recently. I have a question about an issue you hinted at: indirect costs. I know that when a PI applies for a grant, the university gets some percentage of funds from it, if the funding agency allows indirect costs. These are supposed to cover some facilities/administrative costs. My question is, what happens (a) if you're paying everything out of your startup funds or (b) if the grant you apply for does not cover indirect costs? Do universities ever waive these fees? As I understand it, in the context of the grant (at least NIH grants), indirect costs are dependent on direct costs of a grant, i.e. $1 indirect cost for every $1 requested under your research budget with the rate varying widely between institutions. So how does the university administration calculate indirect charges if you as the PI are paying them instead of the NIH?
ReplyDelete(OK, so it's more than one question. I may have spent 10 years in college, but evidently I can't count :P)
Excellent post, PiT. Three clarifications:
ReplyDelete(1) While 9 months institutional salary support is the norm for undergraduate departments, it is not the case in medical schools or research institutes, the vast majority of which "provide" 12 month salaries, but expect faculty to support some large percentage of that (anywhere from 70% to 95%, depending on the institution and circumstance) from research funds--grants and contracts.
(2) It is absolutely essential to have it spelled out clearly and in writing in the offer letter whether the "start-up budget" includes salary support for the PI, or if that is provided separately. In many medical schools, 100% of the PIs salary and fringe benefits are taken from the alloocated "start-up budget" either for a specified number of years or until the start-up is depleted.
(3) In relation to indirect costs, I have never heard of an institution charging indirect costs to a start-up account. Institutions differ on whether they will permit PIs to accept grants that do not allow indirect costs, or limit indirect costs to charging categories and/or amounts that are substantially more restricted than those of federally sponsored awards. Most institutions are willing to allow PIs to compete for and accept junior PI "scholar awards" and foundation grants that provide little or no indirect cost support, but would be very, very unhappy with a faculty member who in the long term did not support most of their own salary and research budget on federal awards that provide the full negotiated indirect cost support for the institution.
Interesting and informative post. I'm years away from this, but there are several points I've wondered about and others that are relevant to the complaining I do about my own advisor.
ReplyDeleteWow, thank you so much for taking the time to write this, PiT! Hugely informational, and also terrifying. I guess the take-home message, then, is to get the sickest possible start-up deal, right off the bat? It sounds like you did pretty well. Are you planning on/would you please consider writing an entry on how you did your negotiating? I'm worried that when the time comes for me, I'll just be so thrilled that someone wants me that I'll sign whatever they put in front of me. Thanks again!
ReplyDeleteAre you planning on/would you please consider writing an entry on how you did your negotiating? I'm worried that when the time comes for me, I'll just be so thrilled that someone wants me that I'll sign whatever they put in front of me.
ReplyDeleteI second Dr Becca's request. I get the impression that the negotiation bit is a major sticking point with female candidates. We don't ask, so we don't get it-contributing to pay differences b/t male and female profs.
Lots of good info PiT. It took me roughly $150K just to equip my lab from scratch, and that was because most of my big ticket items were taken care of in other ways. But, equipping the lab was about half of the money I've spent in the last year and a half and I only need to pay summer salary for my lab peeps (salary wise). Research is expensive, plan accordingly.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the reality check. Good luck!
ReplyDeleteCould you give an idea of how you keep track of expenses? Most PI's I know have almost NO idea of how much they are spending, or how much is left in the kitty at a given time. Expense reports from the business types are nearly inscrutable. There must be a better way?
ReplyDeleteI am somewhat spoiled, as I have an accountant and a research tech who keep track of most of this for me. Every month my accountant gives me a report of expenses and money left in each account (each grant is an account, with the startup being another account). My tech logs every purchase we make in to an excel spreadsheet so I can keep track of trends and see how money is being spent. A little bit of work, but I think it is important.
ReplyDeleteThanks PiT for the column. Small equipment does add up as I have seen in our lab (full Professor recruited and only brought samples with them). We spent a fortune on everything from gel boxes, to pipets, to glassware. And the delivery fee to bring an instrument in our building is killer (somewhere north of $400). I wish DrugMonkey would do a poll on average amount of start-up that a PI gets. Another issue is this money also has a time restriction, we can't just bank it for a rainy day so we have to guess what we need in the future and buy (new equipment for future use, extra supplies and bench equipment to expand the lab). Honestly with the stress of the ultra-shitty grant structure and having to run a lab, I don't know how most PI's have not developed ulcers yet. You guys really are the small business owners of science. Thanks for a job!
ReplyDeleteWell-done, PiT. I especially feel the pains of "Do you have to pay for salaries and/or benefits of anyone you employ? Student stipends and/or tuition?" This stuff adds up! Just 10 hrs a week to a few undergrads, summer salary for a graduate student or two, and benefits for other employees....Wow, I'm out thousands of dollars from my start-up and grant funding.
ReplyDeleteI keep my own excel sheet for each account. This is a royal pain in the butt. However, when my monthly account statements come in from my department I can double check everything. This is totally worth the time, especially when someone elses purchase accidentally shows up on your account!
Again, well-said PiT!
I pretty much spent $500,000 (my whole startup money amt) in one year. That did NOT include any of my salary, but did include:
ReplyDelete-lab stuff to equip us initially (big machines, little machines, reagents etc.)
-postdoc salary (also not benefits, our "general funds" accounts like startup never get charged for benefits, the university covers them out of those)
-miscellaneous PhD student support (summer, one who was no longer eligible for TA spring semester)
-core facility instrument usage (this got way more expensive than I planned)
-various reagents/costs associated with starting some new projects
I knew I could play this risky hand and blow it all to get things going turbo-style because:
1. I had the K99/R00 grant already in place
2. The K99 covers 50% of my salary even though my appointment guarantees my 9 mo. salary so I don't "need" to cover it
3. Our dept head gives assistant profs their "salary recovery" (the amount of our salary beyond the 3 month summer part that we cover with grants) back to us into our startup accounts every year (so I knew I would be replenishing them with about a postdoc's worth of money every year for the first 5 years)
And so far my gamble is paying off...
p.s. I also have a lab assistant and admin assistant who help keep track of our spending, and just on consumables, reagents and other lab needs we spend $5000-6000 a MONTH already in my lab. That does not include any salaries or instrument usage costs. So add that up per year, and we're only in our 2nd year of ramping up, and you can see how expensive it is to run a research lab (doing technology development in chemistry and biology).
ReplyDelete1. Re indirect costs: these are monies you bring in from external sources that goes to the university to help offset the cost of utilities, administration, etc, as well as partly helping to pay for your salary if you’re in a hard money position. Startup funds come from within the university so they can’t charge themselves for indirect costs.
ReplyDelete2. At the moment, I’m applying for any and every grant for which I’m eligible, regardless of whether they pay indirects or not. The smaller foundation grants don’t typically allow indirects and $10K or $50K of direct costs is better than nothing.
3. PP is 100% correct in that you need to have everything spelled out very clearly in your offer letter, including who pays for salaries and benefits, how much that will be and how long it will last.
4. I’ll work on a post about negotiating. I’ve already admitted in previous post to completely screwing up my own negotiations which I can’t find at the moment - if it hadn’t been for the advice and assistance of a couple of trusted mentors, I would be completely fucked right now (I did what Becca is probably going to do and signed their first counteroffer without considering how much further I could push them).
5. I have so much money going out that I can’t keep a track of it all myself - while you know that you ordered Reagent Z for $X, you don’t usually know how much shipping was charged, etc. I get a monthly statement from Accounts Chick and it took me 12 months of head scratching before I finally sucked it up and asked her to explain the charges and to calculate exactly how much was left.
An important point that Arlenna brings up by implication is that once you have the position and the start-up, the single most important ongoing decision you will be making in your first few years is your burn rate.
ReplyDeleteToo fast, and you will run out of money before you have reached escape velocity. Too slow, and you will just gradually peter out without reaching escape velocity.
A factor to be considered in this decision is whether you think that if you run out of start-up and are not yet self-supporting, you will be given a cash infusion by your department/institution, and if so, how much they might float you.
The "over head" cost that the university/institute takes out from your funding once you get it is another thing to take into consideration. I do think that the US is doing this? In Scandinavia and some other European countries, this is norm. It can vary from 20% to 40%... It's a somewhat surprising thing for certain researchers when that 400K in funding turns into 250K after university takes "their cut" for administration etc....
ReplyDeletePiT, it was a very informative post and reminded me, yet again, about all those small things that one can forget... one beaker = cheap, two beakers = ok, five beakers+eveything else times 2 = lots ;)
While we're talking numbers...
ReplyDeleteThe admin for my postdoc adviser keeps track of expenses and updates the lab at our weekly meeting. We have around 10 researchers and typically have no problem going through $25k/month for research supplies and animal charges. Mouse purchases and animal facility charges totaled over $125k in one year. Definitely not the sort of thing students and postdocs usually think about.
TT faculty having only 9 month appointments is one of the things that surprised me most when I did my postdoc in North America. Here in distant land (which I suspect may be very familiar to PiT) I'm not aware of any T&R or Research-focused faculty who don't get a 12 month salary. There might be a fixed term, but you get a paycheque for the full duration of that term.
ReplyDeleteThe best advice I got when I was moving from postdoc to faculty was to make a spending list of what you needed - actually to make two spending lists (what you'd live with and what you'd dream of) and double them. The other thing that I was advised to do was to go through your current lab and photograph everything you used (from forceps - make sure you can read the ID numbers - to the large ticket items (recording rigs, centrifuges)). Then go through and price all of them online or at a conference.
ReplyDeleteOnce you have those numbers, you'll know what you can live with. When I was interviewing, there were several cases where they couldn't reach my minimal number and I knew it wasn't a real option. In the end, personally, I was lucky. The department I liked best had a standard package they were doing for all new hires (there were a bunch) which was significantly above my doubled dream-of number, so I didn't have to do any negotiating.
It's a somewhat surprising thing for certain researchers when that 400K in funding turns into 250K after university takes "their cut" for administration etc....
ReplyDeleteIn the US it is added on top of the money you apply for. Eg if you are awarded a $100,000 grant, you will get $100,000 (direct costs) and, in addition, the institution will get whatever percent the funding agency allows or whatever the agency has negotiated with the institution (eg NIH ~50%) for indirects.
May: in the land far, far away, it is exactly as you described. Lecturers are appointed in a probationary capacity for the first ~3yrs after which time they are simply on a continuing appointment (in some ways similar to tenure). They get 12 month salaries and are allowed the standard 4 weeks vacation time. It's not that dissimilar to a 9 month faculty member in the US having their salary spread over 12 months except that if you aren't expected to do any research (eg clinical faculty) you get 3 months off over the summer with (supposedly) no expectation to do anything remotely concerned with work. The reality is often very different, however.
PiT: great post, thanks for writing this. We do not get startups here (maybe because I am in EUrope or maybe because I am in an IT field), but all you say above is relevant for preparing grant budgets too.
ReplyDeletechall: from my experience in 2 EU countries (one of them Scandinavian) the overhead in Europe is given by the funding agency on top of the costs you ask for. It is the same as the indirect costs that someone discussed above and goes directly to the university to pay for space, electricity, heating, maintenance, etc. Depending on the funding agency it can be anything between 15-30%, so for example, if I apply for a grant of 500K EUR and get it, then my lab will get the 500K, plus the university will get additional 50K-150K EUR that I won't have access to. That is overhead.
Also specify how long your startup money lasts. Do you have to have it all spent out after three years, or if you are careful about budgeting and have a little left over, can you roll it over to subsequent years? Are there restrictions on what you can spend your startup on? Are you allowed to buy computers with it? (sometimes the answer is "no")
ReplyDeleteHere's a little about my experience with this, for what it's worth. Five years into it I've managed to spend about half of my startup, which fortunately has no official expiration. It also has taken me this long to get NIH funding. So what's the trick? Despite many people saying that this is a waste of time, I've relied quite successfully on small foundation grants and junior investigator awards to carry the major operating expenses of the lab including paying the technician. I've taken advantage of our departmental training grants to support postdocs and students for a year here or there and have spend a HUGE amount of effort in mentoring students and postdocs as they apply for fellowships (NRSA, NSF, NARSAD, Epilepsy Foundation, etc.). Although it felt like I was scraping by, in the end it seemed to pan out OK.
ReplyDeleteIt also helps to be cost conscious when buying expensive antibodies and other drugs. Also when starting the lab and buying lots of stuff, you can negotiate prices quite easily. I remember getting a quote from Fisher for all the startup stuff and then sending it to VWR to see if they could give me all that cheaper, then back to Fisher, etc. Most of these companies are willing to give you huge discounts for your business, even after you have done your initial purchases.
That being said my animal costs are very low and my summer salary is only for 2 months, so operating expenses, other than people's salaries, are low.
I also admit that unlike PiT, I would prioritize my summer salary over other expenses. There's no way I will do any more work for free than I need to, I already do so many things for free that people in other fields with less years of education would get paid a boatload of money for. This is after all a job, and how I support my family. I don't buy this suffering for science bit at all.
Despite many people saying that this is a waste of time, I've relied quite successfully on small foundation grants and junior investigator awards to carry the major operating expenses of the lab including paying the technician.
ReplyDeleteI've never noticed anyone ever saying that small foundation grants or junior investigator awards are a waste of time. What are you referring to?
How many antibodies do you need? One? Ten? Watch the dollars fly out the door. And don’t forget you need secondary antibodies. And reagents. And tubes. And slides. What about basic chemicals? Any EDTA on your shelves? NaCl? PBS?
ReplyDeleteFrom that statement, I have a weird feeling you could help me with a problem I am having in my research... why are you anonymous???
Ping!
ReplyDeletehttp://neurodojo.blogspot.com/2010/01/no-postdoc-no-problem.html
I'm now setting up a lab in a big department at a public R1. The down economy has been a good time to do this; Almost all of our glassware, chemicals, and a good bit of our equipment has come from 2 industrial labs that are shutting down and have donated their stuff. Even more stuff has come from senior colleagues whose reserach has moved in directions that no longer require equipment that I can take for myself, as well as two retirements. I thought I'd be buying way more new stuff than I have so far.
ReplyDelete